Biology, 28.10.2020 23:50 lzrd3rik

12. Two teams of scientists hiked 10 kilometers to different study sites. Before their hike, the Valley team ate a lunch of mostly protein. The Mountain team ate a lunch of a mix of starch and protein, but
hiked at high altitude, where there is much less oxygen. Which team probably had an easier time
hiking?
a
Both teams had an easy time hiking because their digestive systems broke down proteins
into amino acids for cells to release energy.
b
Neither team had an easy time hiking: the Valley team's cells needed more glucose from
broken-down starch for a reaction, and the Mountain team's cells needed more oxygen from
air.
С
The Mountain team had an easier time hiking: their cells released energy from protein
reacting with glucose, which was broken down from starch in the digestive system.
d
The Valley team had an easier time hiking; their cells released energy from protein breaking
down in the digestive system, which then combined with oxygen in cells.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Biology

Biology, 21.06.2019 22:00, bryn2433

Researchers determine that the biodiversity in a woodland region is declining. they identify two major threats to the region's biodiversity, a method to address each threat, and the expected outcome of each method. this information is shown in the table. threat method number of species that benefit number of years to see benefit habitat fragmentation reforestation 450 8 introduced prey species biological augmentation 150 2 which statement is an accurate explanation of the information in the table? a. biological augmentation would benefit only a few species because it is typically not very effective. b. biological augmentation would take less time to be effective because it targets the majority of prey species. c. reforestation would take the longest time to be effective because trees take several years to grow. d. reforestation would not benefit many species because most forest species live on the ground.

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 08:40, keilyjaramillo2870

What best explains whether bromine (br) or neon (ne) is more likely to form a covalent bond? bromine forms covalent bonds because it has seven valence electrons, but neon has eight valence electrons and already fulfills the octet rule. bromine forms covalent bonds because it has many electron shells, but neon has only two electron shells and is tightly bound to its electrons. neon forms covalent bonds because it can share its valence electrons, but bromine has seven valence electrons and can gain only one more electron. neon forms covalent bonds because it has only two electron shells, but bromine has many electron shells and will lose electrons in order to fulfill the octet rule.

Answers: 3

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 12:10, lydiapoetz5330

Which is the most likely reason the writer of the play pygmalion chose to change the character of galatea from a statue to working-class woman?

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 20:00, northpolea

Idon’t understand this can someone give me the answer? you

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

12. Two teams of scientists hiked 10 kilometers to different study sites. Before their hike, the Val...