A species of hawk occupies the same niche in a forest that a species of falcon occupies in a nearby forest. What would be the most likely result if members of the hawk population were introduced to the falcon's forest? (3 points) Either the hawks or the falcons would die off or move away. The falcons would kill the hawks. The hawks would adopt a new diet. The falcons and hawks would coexist in the forest.

Either the hawks or the falcons would die off or move away.

Explanation:

Ecological niche refers to the role an organism plays in an ecosystem, which includes how it obtains food, how it interacts, mating etc. two organisms CANNOT occupy the same ecological niche, according to the COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE. This is attributed to competition among both species, which will cause one to outcompete the other.

In this case, a species of hawk occupies the same niche in a forest that a species of falcon occupies in a nearby forest. This means that both species of birds (falcon and hawk) cannot coexist or love together. Hence, either the hawks or the falcons would die off or move away.

americans began to notice growing differences between the northern and southern sections of the country. there were more people living in cities in the north, which made it more urban. more people lived on farms in the south, which made it more rural. while many people were farmers in the northern states, there were now other ways to make a living, such as working in mechanical cotton gins factories manufacturing cloth, tools and other goods. people in the north supported high tariffs on goods imported from europe because the extra cost encouraged people to “buy american” instead. in the southern states, planters did not like tariffs because they sold most of their production to europe and bought their tools from there as well. southerners believed the protective tariff was something that only northern factory owners keep their profits high. so the southern politicians came up with an idea. they would opt out. they would simply ignore the protective tariff. it was ‘null and void’ in south carolina. the state would not collect the taxes on goods imported into south carolina, no matter what the president said they had to do. this decision led to the nullification crisis.

climate change and pollution