subject
Biology, 17.10.2020 07:01 rose6038

In your own words, explain why an organism would require all four of the main biomolecules. What would occur if any of these biomolecules were missing? Are any of the biomolecules more important than the others? Is there one that we could live without?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 21.06.2019 13:30, cmariecarrizales
One function of the poly-a tail on eukaryotic mrna sequences is to the mrna be transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. prokaryotic mrna also has a poly-a tail. choose the best explanation of the prokaryotic poly-a tail. a. prokaryotic poly-a tails have the same functions as eukaryotic poly-a tails, because this process is highly conserved throughout different species. b. prokaryotic poly-a tails aren't important, because prokaryotes don't have nuclei. c. prokaryotic poly-a tails have other functions, because prokaryotes don't have nuclei. d. prokaryotic poly-a tails are composed of a different molecular structure compared with eukaryotic poly-a tails.
Answers: 3
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00, ozzy1146
Despite the differences in mature plant cells, all of them are derived from meristem cells. the three major types of tissue systems develop from the meristem. meristems develop cells in all but which tissue?
Answers: 3
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 05:30, Will1119
Can bacteria reproduce in a way such that when you start out with two bacteria, you get five bacteria? why or why not? * a. yes, because bacteria reproduce sexually, and can produce any number of offspring, just as humans do. b. no, because bacteria grow at an exponential rate. c. no, because when bacteria reproduce, they split into two parts, and two bacteria splitting would result in four bacteria.
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 11:20, gamallopatty
Archeologists have discovered three sites showing conclusive evidence for the mastery of fire in tanzania, from a period slightly after the time that homo habilis was present in africa. these sites clearly were founded by homo erectus, the descendent species of homo habilis that migrated north, out of africa and into asia. homo erectus was known to have mastered fire, from ample evidence at sites in asia. there is no reason to attribute mastery of fire to homo ergaster, the descendent species of homo habilis that remained in africa. which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (a) before their migration, homo erectus occupied african territory as far south as tanzania.(b) the strain of migration provided the selective pressure motivating homo erectus‘ mastery of fire.(c) homo ergaster would not have derived as much benefit from the mastery of fire as did homo erectus.(d) homo ergaster inherited all cultural knowledge from homo habilis, a species that did not have mastery of fire.(e) homo ergaster did not occupy regions as far south as tanzania until well after the time of these three sites.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In your own words, explain why an organism would require all four of the main biomolecules. What wou...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 20.04.2021 18:20
Konu
Arts, 20.04.2021 18:20
Konu
Mathematics, 20.04.2021 18:20