Why are there relatively few errors in dna molecules after dna has been replicated

A. The bonds are so strong that errors are never made

B. Replication enzymes proofread new DNA strand before replication is complete

C. There isn’t much DNA so there are not a lot of chance for error

B. Replication enzymes proofread new DNA strand before replication is complete

(C is 100% in accurate. You have millions of DNA in your body)

relationships aren't everything. people everyday spend there entire life depending on reltionships and for someone to be there for them when this is absurd. why must people depend on someone else to bring them happiness? i'm not saying it wrong to feel happy with someone, but people feel that they need to be in a relationship in order to feel happy, when, this is not true. you can paint, write, read ir slend tume with family ir even spend time working in yourself. this can be an exciting experience to find yourself. it's bot wrong to be in a relationship but if you let it be your only source of happiness, than you will never find true happiness.

so, relationships are not always worth it. if you are so dependent on them, than in the end they arent worth it because you will realize how unhappy you really were. some people even tend to cut ties with family because they think they cabt make them happy, obly realtionships with a lover can. false. in order to find true happiness, one must learn to love themselves if they want to love someone else. it's unhealthy to be always depend on relationships and to alqays be in and out of one.

so live life, get that job you always wanted, buy those new shoes and love yourself. depend on yourself, not others. they arent worth it, you can make yourself more happier than most people can do to you. it's not woth it. take your time and have fun.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest