subject
Biology, 26.03.2020 21:11 vannitling12p4w44f

Darwin’s comments about eyes are often used as evidence against evolution by natural selection, but only because his quotes are taken out of context. Darwin did not think that the possibility that eyes evolved through natural selection was actually "absurd in the highest degree." What was the basis of his logical argument and what evidence do we have to support it?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Biology

image
Biology, 21.06.2019 23:10, chanel2371
Blood has traveled from the heart to the toes. which describes the next step of the circulation process?
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 04:30, ROBIOX3551
The green colored pigment in chloroplasts is? a. nitrogen b. chlorophyll c. chlorophorm d. chlorofloromethane
Answers: 2
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:00, collinpeterson21
Plz ! what does it mean for an allele to be dominant?
Answers: 1
image
Biology, 22.06.2019 17:40, kodak0531
You find a fossil that you are sure shows evidence of bipedalism. you know this because which of the following anatomical traits is present? a. thighbones that angle in toward the knees b. a narrow pelvis c. opposable hallux d. posterior position of the foramen magnum
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Darwin’s comments about eyes are often used as evidence against evolution by natural selection, but...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 22.01.2021 07:20
Konu
Mathematics, 22.01.2021 07:20