Would an amphibian that lacks lungs and breathes entirely through its skin likely be larger or smaller than an amphibian that has lungs? a. smaller because its larger surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. b. larger because its smaller surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. c. larger because its larger surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone. d. smaller because its smaller surface area to volume ratio would allow it to breathe sufficiently through its skin alone.
Answers: 1
Biology, 21.06.2019 21:30, Kaleenamariedavidson
This is one form of rna that transports a specific amino acid to a ribosome during protein synthesis.
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 00:30, Piglets1228
When analyzing tree rings, what do scientists assume a thin ring indicates?
Answers: 2
Would an amphibian that lacks lungs and breathes entirely through its skin likely be larger or small...
History, 06.04.2021 17:10
Mathematics, 06.04.2021 17:10
Mathematics, 06.04.2021 17:10
History, 06.04.2021 17:10
World Languages, 06.04.2021 17:10