Scientists and policy makers often have to work together to set catch limits on fisheries. imagine that a policy maker proposes to allow the fishing of a certain species to go on at current rates because, she says, "fishing at current rates will not impact the ecosystem. we are removing fish at a rate lower than the birth rate of their population." is this claim valid? what indicators would you look at to support or disprove this claim? explain your reasoning.

Scenario #2 in 2001, a population of 2,500 poison dart frogs lived in the amazon rain forest. due to increased deforestation, the population dwindled to 25 frogs in 2019. new government regulations were enacted in 2022, successfully putting an end to the deforestation of the amazon rain forest. once deforestation was stopped, the poison dart frog population was able to recover. by 2050, the population reached 8,000 frogs, of that population, 20 are homozygous recessive for being spotted (ss genotype). q2- ? q- p- p2- 2pq-

This group of organisms perform the process of ammonifcation. a. herbivores b. decomposers c. carnivores c. plants

How do living things obtain phosphorus