Biology, 10.09.2019 20:30 josha43

Why is information that has been peer edited more reliable than information that has
not?
peer editors often check a writer's work for accuracy.
peer editors charge money to publish information.
peer editors make sure that spelling and grammar is correct.
peer editors are more intelligent than writers.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Biology

Biology, 21.06.2019 15:40, mktdonaldson

Aneuron is stimulated with an electric pulse. the action potential is detected at a point 3.70 cm down the axon 0.0052 s later. when the action potential is detected 7.20 cm from the point of stimulation, the time required is 0.0063 s. what is the speed of the electric pulse along the axon? (why are two measurements needed instead of only one? )

Answers: 2

continue

Biology, 21.06.2019 17:00, Obememe

Assume that a student is given two different models of bacteria, with one model consisting of big bacteria and the other consisting of small bacteria. how can the student demonstate the theory of endosymbiosis using the models

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 21.06.2019 23:10, ExperimentsDIYS

(drag each tile to the correct location.) categorize each term as something that is typical of a scientific theory, a scientific hypothesis, or both. - a tentative statement used to guide scientific investigations. - makes predictions about future events. - can be tested by many independent researchers. - based on observations of natural phenomena. - a well-established, highly reliable explanation.

Answers: 1

continue

Biology, 22.06.2019 10:00, kevinleon695

Suppose you use three different scale to weigh a bag of oranges. one scale says the nag weighs 2.1 lb, and third says it weighs 2.1 lb. the actual weight of the bag of oranges is 2.153 lb. which of the following best decribes these results?

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

Why is information that has been peer edited more reliable than information that has
not?