In one hypothesis about the origin of life on earth, scientists propose that organic molecules were produced from inorganic molecules in chemical reactions. how would you evaluate a scientist's claim that reactions, showing organic molecules emerging from inorganic molecules, can be seen in nature today? ( 2 points)
a
the claim must be false because modern-day evolution cannot be observed and recorded.
b
the claim is likely to be false because the current conditions on earth are opposed to the formation of life.
c
the claim is likely to be true because all the elements necessary for the formation of organic molecules are present on earth.
d
the claim must be true because scientists are able to replicate these reactions in a lab.

gold i'm pretty sure i might be wrong

idk what the options are but

these is a strong electrostatic attraction between the ions hence a lot of energy is needed to overcome this attraction

this is why the boiling points are so high

ans.

dna fingerprinting is defined as a process that determines the dna characteristics of an individual. these dna characteristics are unique among individuals as their fingerprints, so it is known as dna fingerprinting.

steps of dna fingerprinting includes extraction of dna from sample, amplification of dna, restriction digestion of amplified dna, and then analysis of dna by gel electrophoresis, respectively.

thus, the next step performed by the scientist is 'to cut the amplified dna (obtained by polymerase chain reaction) by restriction enzymes that cleave the dna into fragments and their analysis.'