What you think about the use of this form of energy, whether or not it would be worth using instead of fossil fuel for the united states and other. (oceans-hydro power)

This is an opinion question, meaning that if you back it up well enough you can't be wrong

Pros to oceans-hydro power
 - cleaner (aka better for the environment)
 - long term sustainability
 - less expensive in the long term

Cons
 - initially more expensive
 - more hydro turbines are required to offset the energy gained from 1 coal    burning plant
 - potentially harmful to (a very limited) marine ecosystem

Just pick a side and back it up.

the burning of fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.good luck! =)cutie~

In some developing nations the percentage of the animal protein from fish in the diet can be as high as 25 percent.  about 85% of fish caught is used for human consumption.  the remainder is converted into fishmeal and fish oil.