Plz carla submitted her paper to be peer reviewed. several of the reviewers had a problem with the way her methods were written. which would most likely be carla’s next step? a. getting rid of the paper and starting a new project b. fixing the errors and resubmitting it c. finding people who would publish it as is d. starting all over from the beginning

B. Fixing the errors and resubmitting it.

Explanation:

A peer- review is the process of examination of a research piece by people who exhibit the knowledge of the discipline or the subject in which the research has been conducted. In this process the mistakes and errors in the research report are identified by the reviewer and the discussed with the researcher so that these mistakes and errors can be corrected.

Among the given, options B. Fixing the errors and resubmitting it. is the correct option. This is because of the fact that several reviewers had a problem with the way the methods of the Carla paper were written. This means there may be several errors which were responsible for the problem. Thus identified errors should be fixed and the report should be resubmitted again.

the answer that best describes the relative refractory period in the neuron is the resting membrane potential is restored, but concentrations of sodium and potassium are not restored to their original state.

the refractory period is the time during which another stimulus given to the neuron will not lead to a second potential. thus, because na+ channels are inactivated during this time, additional depolarizing stimuli do not lead to new action potentials.  

read more on -

answer: 21

step-by-step explanation:

divide 630 by 30. 30 goes into 630 21 times