Asap frank loved to play tennis, and he was on the tennis court every day. frank could hit the ball very hard. he was a good player. one day he met his friend jim for a game of tennis. jim had just started playing tennis. after the game frank said, "i will you with your shots, jim." which statement below would be considered an inference? a. frank and jim are best friends. b. jim loves tennis. c. frank will become a professional tennis player. d. jim will get better at tennis with franks .

Narrowing the answers down, I would say that A would probably make the most sense.  Frank and Jim are best friends could be true.  Jim loving tennis was never inferenced in the passage because he shows no indication of loving tennis.  Frank will become a professional tennis player is not guarenteed from what we learn in the passage.  Jim will get better at tennis with Franks help is not neccessarily true.  It all depends on an individuals will and determination, skill and health to become good at a physical sport.  So in short, A would be my answer.  Tell me what you get!

-TTL

I think it is A. Frank and Jim are best friends

if the type of the food available changes, then the frequency of beak types will change, because birds with beaks more suited to the available food will be more successful over time.

for example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales .