Which best compares habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity? a) hábitat preservation usually protects only individual species, while laws protect entire ecosystems. b) laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems. c) only hábitat preservation has been shown to actually protect biodiversity. d) only laws have been shown to actually protect biodiversity.

The answer to your question is,

B) Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.

-Mabel <3

B) Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.

Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems is a correct explanation for comparison between habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity because laws will only support the protection of the endangered species, banning upon the misuse of a endangered species for any purpose by human society, whereas the habitat preservation will help in protection of the entire ecosystem in which the endangered species and other species are living. This will ensure an overall environmental protection to the biodiversity. Therefore, habitat preservation is better approach over the implementation of laws that protect biodiversity in preserving and protecting biodiversity.

did you mean: energy is defined ashyperactivitya caloric measurementthe ability to move matterthe ability to think and analyze this form of energy is called "energy in motion" or "energy of moving matter"potential energy kinetic energy electrical energy1 ptlights on a stage can be examples of all of the following forms of energy exceptelectrical energylight energythermal energysound energywhen one type of energy changes to another this is called energy energy is stored based on their position or shape this is called energy.kinetic potential sound electromagnetic