When do you think an artist should break the rules of art? Can a work of art be well done but still not be a great work of art? Explain your answer.
How do you think the intended audience shapes a work of art? Please give one example with your answer.
If you were critiquing (judging) this work of art, what principles of art would you say are most important?
swirls of every color make an image that looks like rainbow clouds
Why do you think it’s important for artists to consider how critics will view their work?
i need 3 to 5 sentences for each answer.

1. i think they can break the rules of art anytime, it’s their canvas and they can express themselves however they would like. there are no rules to art. people create what they want, and they do it from their pov??

2. yes, it depends on the person really. people view things differently, and art is subjective. one thing may be pretty to you and someone else may think it’s bad.

3. people who relate to an art piece will like and cherish it more. for example, if someone really likes dogs, they will enjoy a picture of dogs more than cats, and someone who likes cats more than dogs will cherish the cat painting more than the dog one. hope that makes sense.

4. i would say expressing yourself is most important. art would be nothing without it, and they would make it less exciting.

The answer is

Photography has changed its subject matter quite a lot over the past few years. in the 1800's, it was considered normal for families to have  post mortem photos of their loved ones, and now that would be completely unacceptable. i think that photographers have always pushed boundaries and have been eager to capture everything, it is just society that changes their boundaries.