Some modern artists think that it's not important
any longer for a work of art to be "about"
...
Some modern artists think that it's not important
any longer for a work of art to be "about"
something—that what matters most is its visual
impact. What do you think? Do you think that art
should be "about" something in order to be
meaningful? Or do you think the visuals are
more important? Why?
Answers: 1
Arts, 24.06.2019 08:50, jen8268
Discussion board 5 - the romantir areanocturne, op. 9 no 2 solo piano - chopin (peatured listening p 778)when you listen to this piece, what does it make you think of and how does it make you feel? what do you think "nocturne" means? is that an appropriate title for this piece? the piano uses rubato throughout - what effect does that have on the performance? do you think the use of rubato enhances the performance, or would you rather hear a steadybeat throughout the piece? after you post your answer, read and respond to the posts of at least two other classmates.
Answers: 2
Arts, 25.06.2019 03:30, Teenabrewer28
Holas me podrian .. es una encuesta del ambito profesional para la licen de lenguaje xd
Answers: 1
Arts, 25.06.2019 03:30, garciagang0630
What painting has these characteristics? .a composition with simple shapes .shows unity through shape and color. has balance .shows variety in poses .has movement through shape and color
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 14.11.2019 23:31
Chemistry, 14.11.2019 23:31
History, 14.11.2019 23:31
History, 14.11.2019 23:31