subject
Arts, 25.09.2020 14:01 KIAZTUNEZ

Some modern artists think that it's not important any longer for a work of art to be "about"
something—that what matters most is its visual
impact. What do you think? Do you think that art
should be "about" something in order to be
meaningful? Or do you think the visuals are
more important? Why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Arts

image
Arts, 22.06.2019 10:30, Worldprofessor6252
What does the phrase chamber stand for?
Answers: 2
image
Arts, 24.06.2019 08:50, jen8268
Discussion board 5 - the romantir areanocturne, op. 9 no 2 solo piano - chopin (peatured listening p 778)when you listen to this piece, what does it make you think of and how does it make you feel? what do you think "nocturne" means? is that an appropriate title for this piece? the piano uses rubato throughout - what effect does that have on the performance? do you think the use of rubato enhances the performance, or would you rather hear a steadybeat throughout the piece? after you post your answer, read and respond to the posts of at least two other classmates.
Answers: 2
image
Arts, 25.06.2019 03:30, Teenabrewer28
Holas me podrian .. es una encuesta del ambito profesional para la licen de lenguaje xd
Answers: 1
image
Arts, 25.06.2019 03:30, garciagang0630
What painting has these characteristics? .a composition with simple shapes .shows unity through shape and color. has balance .shows variety in poses .has movement through shape and color
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Some modern artists think that it's not important any longer for a work of art to be "about"
...

Questions in other subjects: