Which of these things are illegal in graphic design?
A) lying in an advertisement
B) presenting important information that a blind person couldn’t access
C) refusing to work with a client based on an ethical disagreement
D) using actors in an advertisement

c) Refusing to work with a client based on an ethical disagreement

and

b) presenting important information that a blind person couldn’t access

Explanation:

c) Rule 1.16 Declining or Terminating Representation - Comment. ... if the client demands that the lawyer engage in conduct that is illegal or violates the ... Difficulty may be encountered if withdrawal is based on the client's demand that ... repugnant or with which the lawyer has a fundamental disagreement.

b) Under the ADA, it is illegal to discriminate against hiring anyone on the basis of a disability unless that disability interferes with the basic job function. A blind person doesn't have to be considered for a job as a painter, or a deaf person for one as a music critic.

i'm not sure i completely understand your question, but i will do my best.

i think the answer you are looking for is sequence. (see below)

a repeated melodic fragment would be best defined as repetition, while repeated chords (different or the same) could be a chord progression. however, you then mentioned the chord and melodic fragment beginning on higher or lower pitches, in that case, the answer could be best defined as a sequence. the definition of a sequence is as follows: "the restatement of a motif or longer melodic (or harmonic) passage at a higher or lower pitch in the same voice."

let me know if this !

answer impressionism;