Reasonable people debate the ethics of marketing through influencers. We are sometimes led to believe that they use the product they are advertising, and it isn't disclosed that they are being paid for it. What do you think? Is it ethical? Justify your answer. No links or I will report
If you dont know this answer I will also report it.
I promise.

please give me the real answer.

answer: all of the above

identity theft, is stealing other person's identity to commit fraud or other crimes. identities, are stolen through hi tech and low tech methods and all these can result in the consequences mentioned above. because a criminal when has stolen your identity, can get a loan under your name which will increase a debt burden on the victim, it will also make it harder for the victim to get a loan in the future due to poor credit history and as a result may face loss of a job. there will be a loss of money since the criminal can even rent or buy an apartment under your name.

answer: if though all maps are biased we study them to tell we have to go and use them to tell the direction we have to go but if you don't want to use a compass to find the way to go then the only option is to use the standard maps made by the european's  

explanation:

answer: following the publication of mysterium and with the blessing of the graz school inspectors, kepler began an ambitious program to extend and elaborate his work. he planned four additional books: one on the stationary aspects of the universe (the sun and the fixed stars); one on the planets and their motions; one on the physical nature of planets and the formation of geographical features (focused especially on earth); and one on the effects of the heavens on the earth, to include atmospheric optics, meteorology, and astrology.[24]

he also sought the opinions of many of the astronomers to whom he had sent mysterium, among them reimarus ursus (nicolaus reimers bär)—the imperial mathematician to rudolph ii and a bitter rival of tycho brahe. ursus did not reply directly, but republished kepler's flattering letter to pursue his priority dispute over (what is now called) the tychonic system with tycho. despite this black mark, tycho also began corresponding with kepler, starting with a harsh but legitimate critique of kepler's system; among a host of objections, tycho took issue with the use of inaccurate numerical data taken from copernicus. through their letters, tycho and kepler discussed a broad range of astronomical problems, dwelling on lunar phenomena and copernican theory (particularly its theological viability). but without the significantly more accurate data of tycho's observatory, kepler had no way to address many of these issues.[25]

instead, he turned his attention to chronology and "harmony," the numerological relationships among music, mathematics and the physical world, and their astrological consequences. by assuming the earth to possess a soul (a property he would later invoke to explain how the sun causes the motion of planets), he established a speculative system connecting astrological aspects and astronomical distances to weather and other earthly phenomena. by 1599, however, he again felt his work limited by the inaccuracy of available data—just as growing religious tension was also threatening his continued employment in graz. in december of that year, tycho invited kepler to visit him in prague; on january 1, 1600 (before he even received the invitation), kepler set off in the hopes that tycho's patronage could solve his philosophical problems as well as his social and financial one

explanation: