Compared with medieval art, the purpose of renaissance art was to

a. support the role of patrons.
b. support the role of the church
c. show the wealth of patrons.
d. show the wealth of the church.

The right answer is “show the wealth of patrons”. In the Renaissance, a patron was a wealthy person who sponsored an artist for their work. For example, the Medici Family was one of those, they were a famous family from Florence who ruled and supported of the arts. Lorenzo the Magnificent, a famous member of it, is well-known for sponsoring Italian artists such as Michelangelo and Botticelli.

Compared with Medieval art, the purpose of Renaissance art was to show the wealth of patrons.

Further Explanations:

Renaissance in European History spanned amid the 14th century and 17th century with the advancement of European middle age to modernity. The conceptual source of the theory was its genre of Humanism attained from Roman concepts of Humanities and classical Greek philosophical Protagoras stating that “man is the ration of all things” which became ostensible in science, literate, politics and art, and architecture.

The medieval art conveys the lifestyle of the patrons of that era who initially were the wealthy persons sponsoring artist for work. As we can see those Medici families were among those who were famous sponsoring those arts. Cosimo de' Medici also known as “Father of Fatherland” was an Italian bank officer and a politician and the first from the family of Medici to rule Florence during the Italian Renaissance. He established his authority from wealth, which he used to sway voters of the municipal councilors and officials. His authority was like a danger to the anti-Medici party administered by leaders like ReinaldoDegiAlbizzi.  

Learn more

Answer Details

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Renaissance  

Keywords:

Cosimo de' Medici, politician, Florence, Italian Renaissance, legislative council, autocrat,art, architecture, ReinaldoDegiAlbizzi,science, literate, politics and art, and architecture,Italian Renaissance

the economy of japan in 1945 was completely destroyed. it is a lie that the americans bombed something in japan. they bombed everything and residential areas and factories. the entire industry of japan was eliminated.

during the us government in japan, there was no real development of the industry. japan grew rice, made sake and sold it on the world market, so much that there was a famine in japan.

however, in 1948, the development of some keiretsu began. it began to give growth but not systemic. where the money came from - the united states did not give anything to the keiretsu, not a cent but dzaybattsu in 1943, realizing that the defeat inevitably part of their money through latin america brought to the us by investing in the us economy. for example in the production of aircraft, cars, construction of houses. in 1948 they began to gradually return the money.

in 1950, the korean war began. ships were repaired in japan, japan transported cargoes for this war and people, and provided logistic support. and this earned some money.

in 1952, japan gained independence and the keiretsu began to return money from the united states to japan.

in 1954, the economy began to grow 5% per year. in 1962, due to the actions of the government and the preparation for the olympics, it accelerated to 9%. in 1966 it fell to 6%.

japan reached its prewar level in 1964 at the same time as the olympics.

and then 1968-1989 rapid growth but this is a separate topic.

factors

1. properly allocated resources

2. korean war

3. transistors

4. system change of product structure

but this is interesting

honestly you should get that checked out because it really isn't normal